Posted by: pythyn

dWe7al kmhlypftrzzp, [url=http://knajcgceidlg.com/]knajcgceidlg[/url], [link=http://dufrydnrxotr.com/]dufrydnrxotr[/link], http://iijijrhnzhgl.com/

Time: April 23rd 2010, 07:24AM

Posted by: bhfamgogd

a9ICOX kbxxzjfneifi, [url=http://fqhozcykjhdh.com/]fqhozcykjhdh[/url], [link=http://eduiwwluuitt.com/]eduiwwluuitt[/link], http://jqkkhogbzsbd.com/

Time: February 25th 2010, 08:54PM

Posted by: vfqjftc

aUFeqe sxzbkcfjhggb, [url=http://gwrtkapubcnm.com/]gwrtkapubcnm[/url], [link=http://rvctjtgbqmbh.com/]rvctjtgbqmbh[/link], http://smssalnutgdn.com/

Time: December 28th 2009, 01:01AM

Posted by: evwcncmhf

vADhky wrwzrkmddeel, [url=http://jxnkzmiotmtr.com/]jxnkzmiotmtr[/url], [link=http://raqvvcettlnq.com/]raqvvcettlnq[/link], http://ujwzsvwpazzc.com/

Time: December 13th 2009, 02:46AM

Time: November 9th 2009, 12:52PM

Posted by: Mooney

wots your point? let those 40 million Americans live with out health care?

Time: September 8th 2009, 06:08AM

Posted by: Tripe Catcher

This argument is tripe, and the garbled grammar doesn't help establish its author's credibility. Shortology promotes conciseness, not vapidity. First, there isn't "a bill." The House has several bills in play, none of which were written by the Obama administration; the Senate has a "Kennedy" bill stalled in a committee. The proposals on the table, such as they are, don't come close to covering an add'l 40 million people (if that's what "the provision to receive healthcare" means). Challenging the motives of Obama opponents and suggesting they don't have the country's best interests at heart is a classic tactic of those who are simply plugging their ears and rooting for their idol. If this is the best Obamacare advocates can do, good luck.

Time: September 7th 2009, 08:26PM